Which is a common consequence of poor written communication in public service?

Misunderstandings and decreased efficiency frequently arise from poor written communication in public service. Effective written communication is essential for clearly conveying information, instructions, and policies. When communication is unclear or poorly structured, it can lead to confusion among team members and stakeholders, causing mistakes and requiring additional time and resources to resolve issues. This inefficiency can stall projects, result in duplicated efforts, or lead to divergent interpretations of important tasks and responsibilities.

Commonly, in public service, where clear and concise communication is vital for serving the community and achieving organizational goals, any lapses can significantly hinder progress. As a result, misunderstandings stemming from such communication failures can disrupt workflows, leading to frustration and decreased morale among staff members, thereby exacerbating the challenges faced in fulfilling public service mandates effectively.

The other options do not accurately represent typical consequences of poor communication; increased project budgets typically stem from scope changes or mismanagement that may not relate directly to written communication. Reduced needs for training programs would likely be the opposite outcome of poor communication, as such issues often necessitate additional training to mitigate misunderstandings. Enhanced public perception contradicts the general outcome of poor written communication, which tends to damage trust and credibility in public institutions rather than improve them.